A conversation with Justin Bruch, Cofounder-President & CEO of Clear Frontier, born and raised 5th generation Iowa farmer. He has actively farmed on 4 continents and has spent his entire career working in agriculture across North America (USA/Canada), South America, Europe, and Africa.
Organic makes more money. This is a financial decision first. This doesn’t mean the whole world should go organic tomorrow. It’s refreshing, right, to hear somebody say that out loud. Of course, it’s context-specific: we’re talking about the Midwest in the US, corn, soy, and specialty crops. But a fund that has been operating for the last six years clearly shows it makes more financial sense to farm organically. Not saying it’s easy, you have a lot of things to manage: crop rotation, pest management, weed pressure, manure, and all of that. But it does make more money.
So now the question becomes: how do we get more farms and farmers to transition? What are the financial models? What are the investment models to unlock this transition at scale? Not too fast—organic scale obviously, but still at scale.
That’s what we discuss today with one of the leaders in the space.



ORGANIC, WHEN DONE WELL, MAKES MORE MONEY
Justin argues that the economic model of organic farming, despite its challenges, is financially superior to conventional farming. He bases this on the higher premiums for organic crops and the potential for lower input costs, making it a compelling business decision.
“Ultimately, at the end of the day, I believe the economics are better to farm organically and do that. And then you get all the subset benefits that come off of it. So, is it a chain reaction? In my opinion, it is a chain reaction.” Justin Bruch
IT’S NOT EASY; IT’S NOT FOR EVERYONE, BUT IN CERTAIN CONTEXTS ORGANIC MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.
Organic farming is a difficult practice that requires specific knowledge and conditions and more sustainable system where it can be successfully implemented.
“Organic farming is not easy. I will say that. Controlling not just weeds is very difficult. Managing your fertility is difficult, with your crop rotation and all of those things. It depends on what drives a person, but if you can do that and come out of the backend with a better soil, a healthier soil, which to me is worth a better value and produces a better crop, and you can also make more money and have a better way of life through it, I think those are two pretty attractive reasons to try to go change what you’re doing.” Justin Bruch
WHY JUSTIN TRANSITIONED HIS FAMILY FARM
The initial decision to transition his family’s conventional farm was driven by two key factors: the attractive financial potential he saw in his successful organic neighbours and a desire for a more profitable operation.
“We started transitioning our family farm in Iowa over to certified organic for two reasons. Ultimately financially, we weren’t making the money we wanted to make on conventional agriculture, versus what we thought we could get out of commodity crops and organic as well. We had some neighbours next to us that were organic that had said, “Hey, we’ll kind of lead you along if you want to make the change.” Justin Bruch
HEALTH IS SUCH A BIG DRIVER
Personal health concerns, stemming from years of handling dangerous chemicals, became a major motivator for Justin. He connects the high cancer rates in his home county to agricultural practices, reinforcing his decision to move towards a healthier system for both people and the soil.
“Health is naturally an issue, your own personal health. And then you also start thinking about some of those things that you put on crops that you then turn around and are going to consume directly or indirectly, whether through a protein of an animal source or through a direct consumption and all of those things. For me, yeah, they’re an alarm belt.” Justin Bruch
HOW WE GET MORE YOUNG PEOPLE INTO FARMING
Justin’s model at Clear Frontier is designed to address the high barriers to entry for new farmers. By providing long-term leases and sharing the financial risk of the transition period, they create viable opportunities for a new generation to farm profitably on a smaller scale.
“It gives us the opportunity, especially on smaller assets, to take that younger farmer that wants to farm that doesn’t have the operating line, the capital to go compete against the economy of scale farmer that’s trying to be the low-cost producer, and gives them the opportunity to be able to go farm 500 acres and, once they get through transition, make enough money, ideally, that they can make a living doing it, which is different than what we see in an economy of scale or a size-type farming.” Justin Bruch
OTHER POINTS DISCUSSED
Koen and Justin also talked about:
- Why he decided to build a significant fund that manages over 25,000 acres all intransition to organic
- Investment horizons and long-term investing
- What excites him when it comes to technology
LINKS:
- Clear Frontier
- Exposing Why Farmers Can’t Legally Replant Their Own Seeds
- How One Company Secretly Poisoned The Planet
LINKED INTERVIEWS:
- Birker, Bösel, Mazzola – The Regenerative Agronomy Gap: who do farmers call?
- Walmart heir Lukas Walton’s $15bn bet on the environment
——————————————
Feedback, comments, suggestions? Reach me via Twitter @KoenvanSeijen, in the comments below or through Get in Touch on this website.
Join the Investing in Regenerative Agriculture and Food newsletter on www.eepurl.com/cxU33P
The above references an opinion and is for information and educational purposes only. It is not intended to be investment advice. Seek a duly licensed professional for investment advice.
Hi Koen,
Like most of us I have mixed and strong feelings about this episode. I see the financial logic of the model and I am grateful for the improvements that result. Yet this is essentially a financialization of farmland ownership. That makes it a moral question as well.
There are many reasons why this market approach seems to be the easiest solution in NA and I realize that you are aware. I believe that a more ethical approach which recognizes the damages created by our obscene inequality in NA, would be more public community ownership models . Without drastic changes to subsidies it will be difficult to change our food system and our unhealthy diets. We should start by ending crop insurance subsidies and price guarantees. We should move to a market based economy for food production.
Ending subsidies is also a catalyst for transitioning from chemical production. These subsidies are the reason that the majority of Americans land is devoted to feed for confined animals and biofuels with disastrous consequences. That’s why I cringed every time Justin used the tiered old rhetoric phrase “feeding the world”.
Finally, and there are dozens of other factors, we as a society must enact and enforce rules that transition the external costs on our environment and our health back to the sources of the damage like industrial annual commodity crops grown for exports.
Thanks
Brent